Skip to main content
      |  
    Skip to main content

    Petition_View

    • Details
    • Signatures
    Protect and preserve the green belt off Bosty Lane

    Wain Estates Limited hopes to build up to 650 homes, a neighbourhood centre and public open space.

    The area off Bosty Lane covers mainly agricultural grassland, Lodge Farm, some ancient woodland and the Dingle.

    We oppose any such development on this land for one or many of the reasons stated below.

    1. The preservation of the green belt land is of utmost importance for nature, biodiversity and wildlife.

    2. Degrading or reducing natural habitats will have severe detrimental effects for local wildlife and ecosystems.

    3. The stress and strain on local infrastructure by introducing ~2600 additional residents into the area would reduce our standard of living. Increasing pressures on local healthcare providers, nurseries, schools and roads.

    4. The already congested traffic in and around Daw End Lane at busy times would be severely worsened. Not only increasing congestion and journey times, but also increasing air pollution.

    5. The pollution caused by HGVs and other building equipment over the expected 5-10 year build-time would be severely damaging to the environment in and around the building site.

    6. Ancient woodlands are crucial and irreplaceable habitats because of their immense ecological, cultural, and climate-related value. They have been wooded continuously for centuries, allowing unique and biodiverse ecosystems to develop that cannot be recreated.

    We call on Walsall Council and its Planning Committee, should a planning application be submitted, to vote to reject the proposed commercial development by Wain Estates Limited on the area off Bosty Lane covering mainly agricultural grassland, Lodge Farm, some ancient woodland and the Dingle.

     

    Not Specified
    Wednesday, 24 September 2025
    Friday, 28 November 2025
    Joe Belcher
    This petition currently has 650 signatures in total.
    Petition Signatories
    650 electronic signatures
     Page 1 of 65, items 1 to 10 of 650.
    john abraham
    J Adams
    N Adams
    D Adams
    W Adams
    D Adams
    Jo Adams
    Nigel Adams
    Will Adams
    Daisy Adams
    This petition has been reviewed and the following response has been offered:
    DateUserDescriptionStatus
     Page 1 of 66, items 1 to 10 of 657.
    29/11/2025 00:02(System Event)Petition Closed (responder emailed requesting response)Response Pending
    17/11/2025 22:33Unregistered UserPetition Signed: Steve ElvinPetition Active
    14/11/2025 14:05Unregistered UserPetition Signed: David JohnsonPetition Active
    13/11/2025 18:47Unregistered UserPetition Signed: Andrew MilmanPetition Active
    13/11/2025 18:47Unregistered UserPetition Signed: Janet MilmanPetition Active
    13/11/2025 12:48Unregistered UserPetition Signed: Jane WilliamsPetition Active
    13/11/2025 05:47Unregistered UserPetition Signed: Dawn CoxPetition Active
    12/11/2025 18:50Unregistered UserPetition Signed: Steve RobinsonPetition Active
    12/11/2025 18:46Unregistered UserPetition Signed: Rosanna RobinsonPetition Active
    12/11/2025 17:05Unregistered UserPetition Signed: Michelle BirminghamPetition Active

    Petition_Search